- Categories :
- More
Pastore v. Aviva Canada Inc.
By:
Deutschmann Personal Injury & Disability Law (Lawyers)
| Published 10/05/2012
The Law Times covered the recent decision by the Ontario Supreme Court on Pastore v. Aviva. Some of the significant portions of the Court's rulings are:
- Only one marked or extreme functional impairment due to a mental or behavioural disorder is necessary to qualify accident victims for enhanced catastrophic impairment
- Pain can be considered within the marked or extreme test in cases in which the pain is not clearly related to physical causes and may be related to a mental disorder.
You can read a copy of the ruling on my website. We will now wait and see whether the Ontario Governement's proposed changesregarding major changes to the definition of catastrophic impairment support, rather than challenge, the decisive reasoning of the Courts.
Deutschmann Personal Injury & Disability Law - PERSONAL INJURY & DISABILITY LAW BLOG Blogs: (499)
The Acquisition of a Canadian Tech Company Integral to Car Accident Prevention
Medical Negligence Is the Cause of Many Birth Injuries
Recognizing Brain Injury Symptoms
Questions to Consider When You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer
Snowmachine Safety – OPP reminds riders that, “No Ice is Safe Ice”
What Do Personal Injury Lawyers Specialize in?
Can Vision Zero - a Swedish strategy help prevent motor vehicle collisions in the Region?
Would you Sign a Contract Without Reading It? Terms of Service are Just As Important
Related Blogs: Law and Legal Services
Kitchener Continues Its Ambitious Vision Zero Policy
The Acquisition of a Canadian Tech Company Integral to Car Accident Prevention
Medical Negligence Is the Cause of Many Birth Injuries
Recognizing Brain Injury Symptoms
Questions to Consider When You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer
Snowmachine Safety – OPP reminds riders that, “No Ice is Safe Ice”
What Do Personal Injury Lawyers Specialize in?
Can Vision Zero - a Swedish strategy help prevent motor vehicle collisions in the Region?
